Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] PCI: brcmstb: Fix error path upon call of regulator_bulk_get()
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <hidden>
Date: 2025-03-04 17:07:42
Also in:
linux-pci, lkml
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 11:55:05AM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 10:03 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 12:39:32PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:quoted
If regulator_bulk_get() returns an error, no regulators are created and we need to set their number to zero. If we do not do this and the PCIe link-up fails, regulator_bulk_free() will be invoked and effect a panic. Also print out the error value, as we cannot return an error upwards as Linux will WARN on an error from add_bus(). Fixes: 9e6be018b263 ("PCI: brcmstb: Enable child bus device regulators from DT") Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <redacted> --- drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c index e0b20f58c604..56b49d3cae19 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c@@ -1416,7 +1416,8 @@ static int brcm_pcie_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) ret = regulator_bulk_get(dev, sr->num_supplies, sr->supplies); if (ret) { - dev_info(dev, "No regulators for downstream device\n"); + dev_info(dev, "Did not get regulators; err=%d\n", ret);Why is this dev_info() instead of dev_err()?I will change this.quoted
quoted
+ pcie->sr = NULL;Why can't you set 'pcie->sr' after successfull regulator_bulk_get()?Not sure I understand -- it is already set before a successful regulator_bulk_get() call.
Didn't I say 'after'?
I set it to NULL after an unsuccessful result so the structure will not be passed to subsequent calls.
If you set the pointer after a successful regulator_bulk_get(), you do not need to set it to NULL for a failure. - Mani -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்