On 25-02-26 11:30:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

I have checked the review-process again at:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/list/?series=935897

This does not matter - that's not a patchwork anyone uses...

quoted

It seems no one gives any Reviewed-by or Acked-by Tag.

You were directly addressed! So you got email and what did you do with it?

And lists received it:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ac6c4a8b-a6bd-44a9-993b-3b743a172dcc@kernel.org/ (local)

I am sorry about that. I checked this email with our IT engineers at
office365 administration page, it was not received by Microsoft office365
server, we don't know what's the reason.

That's the only email which did not reach you, I think. 4 or 5 others
did, so this could mean your system will spam/reject silently anything
with review tag (or email address).

If so, your corporate mail system is not suitable for upstream work
(Microsoft outlook is known of poor quality in that matter and that's
not the first case people have trouble with Outlook servers) and maybe
you should switch to b4-relay and other mail boxes.

quoted

I will put your Reviewed-by tag when sending v3 patch, may I get your
Ack for the 1st patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/330a01b7-7285-47fe-abb1-8d5fa71dd240@kernel.org/T/#u (local)

I'll send it, but I still have doubts Microsoft won't put me in spam :/

Hi Krzysztof,

Do you use kernel.org as your smtp server? It may kernel.org's smtp
server issue, both lore.kernel.org[1] and patchwork.kernel.org[2]
have received your ack for my v2 patch.

But only lore.kernel.org [3] received your reviewed-by Tag for my v1
patch, the patch.kernel.org[4] did not receive it, office365 server
for my company also did not receive it.

Another strange is I did not received [5], but my colleagues in our
upstream mail list (cix-kernel-upstream@cixtech.com) received it, I have
not in that list at that time (now I am at it), but my name is at your
reply to, it seems kernel.org did not send to me.

That's just my suspect, if someone meets the similar issues in future,
it may prove my suspect.


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/df24ac09-1717-4a91-a710-cf1e46341ca8@kernel.org/ (local)
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20250226012136.854614-2-peter.chen@cixtech.com/#26265571
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ac6c4a8b-a6bd-44a9-993b-3b743a172dcc@kernel.org/ (local)
[4] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20250220084020.628704-2-peter.chen@cixtech.com/
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/all/f56e9c68-0745-43c1-ae80-e2dc0942ea07@kernel.org/ (local)

-- 

Best regards,
Peter