On 25-02-26 09:40:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

quoted

On 26/02/2025 02:21, Peter Chen wrote:

quoted

Add device tree bindings for CIX P1 (Internal name sky1) Arm SoC,
it consists several SoC models like CP8180, CD8180, etc.

Acked-by: Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@cixtech.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@cixtech.com>
---

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

I have checked the review-process again at:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/list/?series=935897

This does not matter - that's not a patchwork anyone uses...

quoted

It seems no one gives any Reviewed-by or Acked-by Tag.

You were directly addressed! So you got email and what did you do with it?

And lists received it:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ac6c4a8b-a6bd-44a9-993b-3b743a172dcc@kernel.org/ (local)

I am sorry about that. I checked this email with our IT engineers at
office365 administration page, it was not received by Microsoft office365
server, we don't know what's the reason.

I will put your Reviewed-by tag when sending v3 patch, may I get your
Ack for the 1st patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/330a01b7-7285-47fe-abb1-8d5fa71dd240@kernel.org/T/#u (local)

-- 

Best regards,
Peter