Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: add rk3328 usb3 phy node

Hello Diederik,

On 2025-01-16 17:53, Diederik de Haas wrote:

On Thu Jan 16, 2025 at 2:01 PM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

On 15/01/2025 02:26, Peter Geis wrote:

quoted

Add the node for the rk3328 usb3 phy. This node provides a combined usb2
and usb3 phy which are permenantly tied to the dwc3 usb3 controller.

Signed-off-by: Peter Geis <redacted>
---

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi
index 7d992c3c01ce..181a900d41f9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi

@@ -903,6 +903,43 @@ u2phy_host: host-port {
 		};
 	};

+	usb3phy: usb3-phy@ff460000 {
+		compatible = "rockchip,rk3328-usb3phy";
+		reg = <0x0 0xff460000 0x0 0x10000>;
+		clocks = <&cru SCLK_REF_USB3OTG>, <&cru PCLK_USB3PHY_OTG>, <&cru PCLK_USB3PHY_PIPE>;

Please wrap code according to coding style (checkpatch is not a coding
style description, but only a tool), so at 80.

I'm confused: is it 80 or 100?

I always thought it was 80, but then I saw several patches/commits by
Dragan Simic which deliberately changed code to make use of 100.
Being fed up with my own confusion, I submitted a PR to
https://github.com/gregkh/kernel-coding-style/ which got accepted:
https://github.com/gregkh/kernel-coding-style/commit/5c21f99dc79883bd0efeba368193180275c9c77a

So now both the vim plugins code and README say 100.
But as noted in my commit message:

  Note that the current upstream 'Linux kernel coding style' does NOT
  mention the 100 char limit, but only mentions the preferred max 
length
  of 80.

Or is it 100 for code, but 80 for DeviceTree files and bindings?

I don't know about the DT files and bindings, but the 100-column limit
for the kernel code has been in effect for years.  In this day and age,
80 columns is really not much (for the record, I've been around when
using 80x25 _physical_ CRT screens was the norm).