Thread (31 messages) 31 messages, 2 authors, 2025-01-07

Re: [PATCH v4 14/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Report events that belong to devices attached to vIOMMU

From: Nicolin Chen <hidden>
Date: 2025-01-06 18:46:39
Also in: linux-doc, linux-iommu, linux-kselftest, linux-patches, lkml

On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 11:01:32AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On 1/4/25 03:43, Nicolin Chen wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h b/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
index 0a08aa82e7cc..55e3d5a14cca 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
@@ -1016,9 +1016,24 @@ struct iommu_ioas_change_process {
  /**
   * enum iommu_veventq_type - Virtual Event Queue Type
   * @IOMMU_VEVENTQ_TYPE_DEFAULT: Reserved for future use
+ * @IOMMU_VEVENTQ_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3: ARM SMMUv3 Virtual Event Queue
   */
  enum iommu_veventq_type {
  	IOMMU_VEVENTQ_TYPE_DEFAULT = 0,
+	IOMMU_VEVENTQ_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3 = 1,
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct iommu_vevent_arm_smmuv3 - ARM SMMUv3 Virtual Event
+ *                                  (IOMMU_VEVENTQ_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3)
+ * @evt: 256-bit ARM SMMUv3 Event record, little-endian.
+ *       (Refer to "7.3 Event records" in SMMUv3 HW Spec)
+ *
+ * StreamID field reports a virtual device ID. To receive a virtual event for a
+ * device, a vDEVICE must be allocated via IOMMU_VDEVICE_ALLOC.
+ */
+struct iommu_vevent_arm_smmuv3 {
+	__aligned_le64 evt[4];
  };
Nit: I think it would be more readable to add a check in the vevent
reporting helper.
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/driver.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/driver.c
index 77c34f8791ef..ccada0ada5ff 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/driver.c
@@ -86,6 +86,9 @@ int iommufd_viommu_report_event(struct iommufd_viommu
*viommu,
        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!data_len || !event_data))
                return -EINVAL;

+       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(type != IOMMU_VEVENTQ_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3))
+               return -EINVAL;
+
Hmm, that's a good point I think.
        down_read(&viommu->veventqs_rwsem);

        veventq = iommufd_viommu_find_veventq(viommu, type);
		    ^
		    |
We actually have been missing a type validation entirely, so the
type could have been rejected by this function. Perhaps we should
add a static list of supported types to struct iommufd_viommu_ops
for drivers to report so that then the core could reject from the
first place during a vEVENTQ allocation.
Or perhaps the compiler could automatically make a warning if the @type
is not one of those values in enum iommu_veventq_type?
Just gave that a try. Mine doesn't give any warning. Not sure if
needs to be some "-W" augment though..
Others look good to me.
Thanks for the review!

Nicolin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help