Re: [PATCH v2 06/19] iommufd/viommu: Add IOMMU_VIOMMU_SET/UNSET_VDEV_ID ioctl
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: 2024-10-01 13:46:25
Also in:
linux-iommu, linux-kselftest, lkml
On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 01:54:05AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 10:38:23AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:quoted
On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 01:03:53PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:quoted
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 09:59:43AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:quoted
Introduce a pair of new ioctls to set/unset a per-viommu virtual device id that should be linked to a physical device id via an idev pointer.Given some of the other discussions around CC I suspect we should rename these to 'create/destroy virtual device' with an eye that eventually they would be extended like other ops with per-CC platform data. ie this would be the interface to tell the CC trusted world that a secure device is being added to a VM with some additional flags.. Right now it only conveys the vRID parameter of the virtual device being created. A following question is if these objects should have their own IDs in the iommufd space too, and then unset is not unset but just a normal destroy object. If so then the thing you put in the ids xarray would also just be a normal object struct.I found that adding it as a new object makes things a lot of easier since a vdevice can take refcounts of both viommu and idev. So both destroy() callbacks wouldn't be bothered. While confirming if I am missing something from the review comments, I am not quite sure what is "the thing you put in the ids xarray".. I only added a vRID xarray per viommu, yet that doesn't seem to be able to merge into the normal object struct. Mind elaborating?
I would think to point the vRID xarray directly to the new iommufd vdevice object Jason