On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 02:43:26PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 10:37:45AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
quoted
we only have virtual device ID in its data structure. Also, the
virtual device sounds a bit confusing, given we already have idev.
idev is "iommufd device" which is the physical device
The virtual device is the host side handle of a device in a VM.
Yea, we need that narrative in kdoc to clearly separate them.
quoted
That being said, if we have a clear picture that in the long term
we would extend it to hold more information, I think it could be
a smart move.
Perhaps virtual device can have its own "attach" to vIOMMU? Or
would you still prefer attaching via proxy hwpt_nested?
I was thinking just creating it against a vIOMMU is an effective
"attach" and the virtual device is permanently tied to the vIOMMU at
creation time.
Ah, right! The create is per-viommu, so it's being attached.
Nicolin