Re: [PATCH 09/37] clk: renesas: rzg2l: fix computation formula
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2023-09-26 14:44:21
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, linux-mmc, linux-renesas-soc, linux-serial, lkml
Hi Claudiu, On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 1:47 PM claudiu beznea [off-list ref] wrote:
On 14.09.2023 15:55, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 6:52 AM Claudiu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com> According to hardware manual of RZ/G2L (r01uh0914ej0130-rzg2l-rzg2lc.pdf) the computation formula for PLL rate is as follows: Fout = ((m + k/65536) * Fin) / (p * 2^s) and k has values in range [-32768, 32767]. Dividing k by 65536 with integer variables leads all the time to zero. Thus we may have slight differences b/w what has been set vs. what is displayed. Thus, get rid of this and decompose the formula before dividing k by 65536. Fixes: ef3c613ccd68a ("clk: renesas: Add CPG core wrapper for RZ/G2L SoC") Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>Thanks for your patch!quoted
--- a/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c@@ -696,18 +696,22 @@ static unsigned long rzg2l_cpg_pll_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct pll_clk *pll_clk = to_pll(hw); struct rzg2l_cpg_priv *priv = pll_clk->priv; unsigned int val1, val2; - unsigned int mult = 1; - unsigned int div = 1; + unsigned int div; + u64 rate; + s16 kdiv; if (pll_clk->type != CLK_TYPE_SAM_PLL) return parent_rate; val1 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK1(pll_clk->conf)); val2 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK2(pll_clk->conf)); - mult = MDIV(val1) + KDIV(val1) / 65536; + kdiv = KDIV(val1); div = PDIV(val1) << SDIV(val2); - return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)parent_rate * mult, div); + rate = (u64)MDIV(val1) * parent_rate; + rate += ((long long)parent_rate * kdiv) / 65536;As the division is a binary shift, you can use the mul_u64_u32_shr() helper, and incorporate the sdiv shift at the same time: rate += mul_u64_u32_shr(parent_rate, KDIV(val1), 16 + SDIV(val2));
[1]^
quoted
You can save a multiplication by premultiplying mdiv by 65536: rate = mul_u64_u32_shr(parent_rate, (MDIV(val1) << 16)) + KDIV(val1), 16 + SDIV(val2));
[2]^
Looking again at this: KDIV (aka DIV_K) could have negative values thus mul_u64_u32_shr() cannot be used here.
That means you can indeed not use [1].
But you can still use [2], as MDIV() must be in the range 64..533[3],
so "(MDIV(val1) << 16)) + (s16)KDIV(val1)" is always positive.
Note that you do need the cast to s16 (which I had missed before), or
the intermediate variable kdiv of type s16 (like in your patch).
[3] As the current PLL driver is read-only, there is no calculation or
validation of the PLL parameters.
quoted
quoted
+ + return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(rate, div);return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(rate, PDIV(val1));
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel