On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 09:58:48AM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:14:29AM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 10:39:13AM +0530, shravan kumar wrote:
quoted
From: Shravan Chippa <redacted>
quoted
quoted
@@ -666,11 +885,26 @@ static int imx334_init_pad_cfg(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
struct v4l2_subdev_format fmt = { 0 };
fmt.which = sd_state ? V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY : V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE;
- imx334_fill_pad_format(imx334, &supported_mode, &fmt);
+ imx334_fill_pad_format(imx334, &supported_modes[0], &fmt);
Now that there are multiple modes supported, this would appear to get the
width, height as well as the other fields (apart from mbus code) from the
first mode.
Is this statement supposed to be a request to change something, or just
a throwaway comment? It's a little hard for me to understand your
intention here, sorry.
Just pointing to what looks like a bug.
--
Sakari Ailus
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel