On Wed, 01 Feb 2023 10:18:47 +0100
Alexander Sverdlin [off-list ref] wrote:

Hello Nikita,

On Wed, 2023-02-01 at 12:10 +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:

quoted

This prepares ep93xx SOC gpio to convert into device tree driver:
- dropped banks and legacy defines
- split AB IRQ and make it shared

We are relying on IRQ number information A, B ports have single
shared IRQ, while F port have dedicated IRQ for each line.

Also we had to split single ep93xx platform_device into multiple,
one for each port, without this we can't do a full working
transition from legacy platform code into device tree capable. All
GPIO_LOOKUP were change to match new chip namings.

Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <redacted>
---
Bart, i've rebased on the top of gpio/for-next (there were issues
indeed), but this patch still won't apply. That's becouse it's
dependant on Linus patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20230111132210.134478-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org/T/ (local)

Alexander can we have Linus patch somehow applied to ep93xx ?   

in contrast to me Linus and Bartosz do maintain their GPIO tree,
from my side I've performed a quick test, so it's OK from my PoV to
apply, but I cannot really assist here more.

Oh sorry about that, i thought if it refers to
"arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c" - you or Hartley should apply them.

Linus and Bartosz do maintain their GPIO tree

Then it should already exist in gpio/for-next ;).

echo heartbeat > /sys/class/leds/platform\:grled/trigger
echo heartbeat > /sys/class/leds/platform\:rdled/trigger

Both working on my ts7250.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel