Re: [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add TQ-Systems LS1021A board
From: Alexander Stein <hidden>
Date: 2023-01-20 08:58:30
Also in:
linux-devicetree
Hi Krzysztof, thanks for your feedback. Am Donnerstag, 19. Januar 2023, 17:59:20 CET schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
On 19/01/2023 15:42, Alexander Stein wrote:quoted
From: Matthias Schiffer <redacted> TQMLS102xA is a SOM family using NXP LS1021A CPU family. MBLS102xA is an evaluation mainbord for this SOM.typo: mainboard
Thanks.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <redacted> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <redacted> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yamlb/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml index 3ba354578e8f9..b54a920934c9d 100644--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml@@ -1164,6 +1164,13 @@ properties: - fsl,ls1021a-twr - const: fsl,ls1021a + - description: TQ-Systems TQMLS1021A SoM on MBLS102xA board + items: + - enum: + - tq,ls1021a-tqmls1021a-mbls102xaCan mbls102xa come with something else than tqmls1021a?
I don't expect this. MBLS102xa is the starterkit carrier board for TQMLS1021A module. But the module can come on other custom carrier boards. This name schema is similar to e.g. imx8mp-tqma8mpql-mba8mpxl.dts
quoted
+ - const: tq,ls1021a-tqmls1021aWhy duplicating ls1021a? Can tqmls1021a come with something else? This is redundant.
I agree this is somewhat redundant, but this follows the naming scheme '<vendor>,<soc>-<module>' which is rather widespread for i.MX boards/modules. TQMLS1021A is the module name I can't change, actually part of the series TQMLS102xA.
quoted
+ - const: fsl,ls1021a + - description: LS1028A based Boards items: - enum:Best regards, Krzysztof
Best regards, Alexander _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel