Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 7 authors, 2023-06-08

Re: [v4 1/5] dt-bindings: mfd: Add aspeed pwm-tach binding

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2022-11-23 08:27:29
Also in: linux-aspeed, linux-devicetree, linux-doc, linux-hwmon, linux-pwm, lkml

On 23/11/2022 09:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 23/11/2022 07:16, Billy Tsai wrote:
quoted
Add device binding for aspeed pwm-tach device which is a multi-function
device include pwm and tach function.
Subject: drop second, redundant "bindings".
Also use proper PATCH prefix.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Billy Tsai <redacted>
---
 .../bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2600-pwm-tach.yaml | 73 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2600-pwm-tach.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2600-pwm-tach.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2600-pwm-tach.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e2a7be2e0a18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2600-pwm-tach.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+# Copyright (C) 2021 Aspeed, Inc.
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/aspeed,ast2600-pwm-tach.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: PWM Tach controller
+
+description: |
+  The PWM Tach controller is represented as a multi-function device which
+  includes:
+    PWM
+    Tach
+
+maintainers:
+  - Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com>
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    items:
+      - enum:
+          - aspeed,ast2600-pwm-tach
+      - const: syscon
+      - const: simple-mfd
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clocks:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  resets:
+    maxItems: 1
If this is simple-mfd then it cannot take clocks or resets.  Usually the
recommendation for such case is: This is not simple-mfd, drop it. Drop
also syscon and make a proper device.

However I am surprised to see such change, so I have no clue why this
was done.
Actually now I see it was like that in previous patch, I just missed it
during previous review. Anyway this must be fixed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help