On 27/09/2022 15:54, Guillaume Ranquet wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 19/09/2022 18:56, Guillaume Ranquet wrote:
quoted
Add mt8195 SoC bindings for hdmi and hdmi-ddc
Make port1 optional for mt8195 as it only supports HDMI tx for now.
Requires a ddc-i2c-bus phandle.
Requires a power-domains phandle.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <redacted>
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,hdmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,hdmi.yaml
index bdaf0b51e68c..abb231a0694b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,hdmi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,hdmi.yaml
@@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ properties:
- mediatek,mt7623-hdmi
- mediatek,mt8167-hdmi
- mediatek,mt8173-hdmi
+ - mediatek,mt8195-hdmi
+
+ clocks: true
+ clock-names: true
????
Why is this moved?
quoted
reg:
maxItems: 1@@ -28,20 +32,6 @@ properties:
interrupts:
maxItems: 1
- clocks:
- items:
- - description: Pixel Clock
- - description: HDMI PLL
- - description: Bit Clock
- - description: S/PDIF Clock
-
- clock-names:
- items:
- - const: pixel
- - const: pll
- - const: bclk
- - const: spdif
Clock definition with constraints should stay here. You just customize
it per variant.
Clocks are different between the two hardwares, so I've tried moving everything
inside the if/else block.
Is there a better way to express this?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19-rc6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,exynos7-clock.yaml#L38
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel