On Fri, 03 Jun 2022 10:14:11 +0100,
Mark Brown [off-list ref] wrote:

On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 12:38:14PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:

quoted

As it turns out, this isn't really a good match for flags, and
we'd be better off if this was a simpler tristate, each state
having a name that actually reflect the state:

- FP_STATE_CLEAN
- FP_STATE_HOST_DIRTY
- FP_STATE_GUEST_DIRTY

I had to think a bit more than I liked about the _DIRTY in the
names of the host and guest flags, but that's really just
bikeshedding and not a meaningful issue.

Another option was:

- FP_STATE_FREE
- FP_STATE_HOST_OWNED
- FP_STATE_GUEST_OWNED

I don't mind wither way.

Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel