On 10/06/2022 00:05, Tomer Maimon wrote:

Hi Krzysztof,

Sorry, but I thought the fix is only to add an explanation to the
dt-binding file as was done in V2.

The NPCM8XX binding is done in the same way as the NPCM7XX and both
use the same reset driver and use the same reset method in upstreamed
NPCM reset driver.

Can you please explain again what you suggest to do?

If you want abstract IDs, they must be abstract, so not representing
hardware registers. Then they start at 1 and are incremented by 1.

Other option is to skip such IDs entirely and use register
offsets/addresses directly, like Arnd suggested in linked documents. I
think he expressed it clearly, so please read his answers which I linked
in previous discussion.

There is no single reason to store register addresses/values/offsets as
binding headers. These are not bindings.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel