On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 2:58 PM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 3:22 PM Rafał Miłecki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+#include <linux/of.h>
I don't like this. This shows not thought through the design of the series.
What I rather expect is a proper interfacing layer that you fill with
options that can be provided by corresponding underlying
implementation, e.g. DT.
I agree, the DT parts should land in pinctrl/devicetree.c in the
end with an opt-in for ACPI & board files. I don't know if we
can use software nodes fully instead of board file-specific
helpers at this point, it seems to have
grown pretty competent.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel