On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 3:22 PM Rafał Miłecki [off-list ref] wrote:
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
+#include <linux/of.h>
I don't like this. This shows not thought through the design of the series.
What I rather expect is a proper interfacing layer that you fill with
options that can be provided by corresponding underlying
implementation, e.g. DT.
Moreover, before doing this you probably would need to refactor the
pin control core to get rid of DT specifics, i.e. abstract them away
first.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel