Re: [PATCH v10 06/11] arm64: Make profile_pc() use arch_stack_walk()
From: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-27 16:15:28
Also in:
live-patching, lkml
On 10/27/21 8:32 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:58:42PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote:quoted
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <redacted> Currently, profile_pc() in ARM64 code walks the stack using start_backtrace() and unwind_frame(). Make it use arch_stack_walk() instead. This makes maintenance easier. Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <redacted> --- arch/arm64/kernel/time.c | 22 +++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c index eebbc8d7123e..671b3038a772 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c@@ -32,22 +32,26 @@ #include <asm/stacktrace.h> #include <asm/paravirt.h> +static bool profile_pc_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc) +{ + unsigned long *prof_pc = arg; + + if (in_lock_functions(pc)) + return true; + *prof_pc = pc; + return false; +} + unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs) { - struct stackframe frame; + unsigned long prof_pc = 0; if (!in_lock_functions(regs->pc)) return regs->pc;This can go -- the first call to profile_pc_cb() will use regs->pc.
Agreed.
With that gone, and the include updates to use <linux/stacktrace.h>: Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
I will make the two changes. Madhavan _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel