Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 4 authors, 2021-11-14
STALE1696d
Revisions (11)
  1. v7 [diff vs current]
  2. v7 [diff vs current]
  3. v8 [diff vs current]
  4. v9 [diff vs current]
  5. v10 current
  6. v11 [diff vs current]
  7. v12 [diff vs current]
  8. v13 [diff vs current]
  9. v14 [diff vs current]
  10. v15 [diff vs current]
  11. v15 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v10 04/11] arm64: Make return_address() use arch_stack_walk()

From: <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-15 02:59:32
Also in: live-patching, lkml
Subsystem: arm64 port (aarch64 architecture), the rest · Maintainers: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Linus Torvalds

From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <redacted>

Currently, return_address() in ARM64 code walks the stack using
start_backtrace() and walk_stackframe(). Make it use arch_stack_walk()
instead. This makes maintenance easier.

Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c
index a6d18755652f..92a0f4d434e4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c
@@ -35,15 +35,11 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(save_return_addr);
 void *return_address(unsigned int level)
 {
 	struct return_address_data data;
-	struct stackframe frame;
 
 	data.level = level + 2;
 	data.addr = NULL;
 
-	start_backtrace(&frame,
-			(unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0),
-			(unsigned long)return_address);
-	walk_stackframe(current, &frame, save_return_addr, &data);
+	arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL);
 
 	if (!data.level)
 		return data.addr;
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help