On 10/27/21 8:32 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:58:42PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote:
quoted
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <redacted>
Currently, profile_pc() in ARM64 code walks the stack using
start_backtrace() and unwind_frame(). Make it use arch_stack_walk()
instead. This makes maintenance easier.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <redacted>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/time.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
index eebbc8d7123e..671b3038a772 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
@@ -32,22 +32,26 @@
#include <asm/stacktrace.h>
#include <asm/paravirt.h>
+static bool profile_pc_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc)
+{
+ unsigned long *prof_pc = arg;
+
+ if (in_lock_functions(pc))
+ return true;
+ *prof_pc = pc;
+ return false;
+}
+
unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- struct stackframe frame;
+ unsigned long prof_pc = 0;
if (!in_lock_functions(regs->pc))
return regs->pc;
This can go -- the first call to profile_pc_cb() will use regs->pc.
Agreed.
With that gone, and the include updates to use <linux/stacktrace.h>:
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
I will make the two changes.
Madhavan