Re: [RESEND v2 4/5] PCI: imx6: Fix the clock reference handling unbalance when link never came up

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 02:35:36AM +0000, Richard Zhu wrote:

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: Krzysztof Wilczyński <redacted>
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2021 5:54 PM
To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>; l.stach@pengutronix.de;
bhelgaas@google.com; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
dl-linux-imx [off-list ref]; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RESEND v2 4/5] PCI: imx6: Fix the clock reference handling
unbalance when link never came up

quoted

I hope you don't mind me asking, but how is an empty default case in the
switch statement helping IMX6Q and IMX6QP?  What does it achieve for
these two controllers specifically?

[Richard Zhu] Never mind. 😊.
There might be following building warning if the "default:break" is removed.
"  CC      drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.o
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c: In function ‘imx6_pcie_clk_disable’:
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c:527:2: warning: enumeration value ‘IMX6Q’ not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
  527 |  switch (imx6_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
      |  ^~~~~~
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c:527:2: warning: enumeration value ‘IMX6QP’ not handled in switch [-Wswitch]"

Sorry, I didn't see this until after asking the same question as
Krzysztof.

Sigh.  That's a really annoying gcc warning, but I guess I won't fight
it ;)

Bjorn

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel