Re: [RFC PATCH v8 2/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder code for better consistency and maintenance
From: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-02 07:10:07
Also in:
live-patching, lkml
From: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-02 07:10:07
Also in:
live-patching, lkml
On 9/1/21 11:20 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 06:19:07PM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:quoted
Mark Rutland,quoted
Do you also approve the idea of placing unreliable functions (from an unwind perspective) in a special section and using that in the unwinder for reliable stack trace?Rutland is on vacation for a couple of weeks so he's unlikely to reply before the merge window is over I'm afraid.
OK. I am pretty sure he is fine with the special sections idea. So, I will send out version 8 with the changes you requested and without the "RFC". Thanks. Madhavan _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel