RE: [RFC PATCH v8 3/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder

quoted

Hi Madhavan,

quoted

@@ -245,7 +271,36 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
 		fp = thread_saved_fp(task);
 		pc = thread_saved_pc(task);
 	}
-	unwind(consume_entry, cookie, task, fp, pc);
+	unwind(consume_entry, cookie, task, fp, pc, false); }
+
+/*
+ * arch_stack_walk_reliable() may not be used for livepatch until
+all of
+ * the reliability checks are in place in unwind_consume(). However,
+ * debug and test code can choose to use it even if all the checks
+are not
+ * in place.
+ */

I'm glad to see the long-awaited function :)

Does the above comment mean that this comment will be removed by
another patch series that about live patch enablement, instead of [PATCH 4/4]?

It seems to take time... But I start thinking about test code.

Yes. This comment will be removed when livepatch will be enabled eventually.
So, AFAICT, there are 4 pieces that are needed:

- Reliable stack trace in the kernel. I am trying to address that with my patch
  series.

- Mark Rutland's work for making patching safe on ARM64.

- Objtool (or alternative method) for stack validation.

- Suraj Jitindar Singh's patch for miscellaneous things needed to enable live patch.

Once all of these pieces are in place, livepatch can be enabled.

That said, arch_stack_walk_reliable() can be used for test and debug purposes anytime once this patch series gets accepted.

Thanks.

Madhavan

Thank you for the information.

Keiya

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel