On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 8:36 AM Zhiyong Tao [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
This patch adds rsel define for mt8195.
Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao <redacted>
---
include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h
index 7e16e58fe1f7..f5934abcd1bd 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h
@@ -16,6 +16,15 @@
#define MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_10 102
#define MTK_PUPD_SET_R1R0_11 103
+#define MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_000 200
+#define MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_001 201
+#define MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_010 202
+#define MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_011 203
+#define MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_100 204
+#define MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_101 205
+#define MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_110 206
+#define MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_111 207
Could you keep the spacing between constants tighter, or have no spacing
at all? Like having MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_000 defined as 104 and so on. This
would reduce the chance of new macro values colliding with actual resistor
values set in the datasheets, plus a contiguous space would be easy to
rule as macros.
ChenYu
#define MTK_DRIVE_2mA 2
#define MTK_DRIVE_4mA 4
#define MTK_DRIVE_6mA 6
--
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel