On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 at 18:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski
[off-list ref] wrote:

On 30/07/2021 16:49, Sam Protsenko wrote:

quoted

Add Samsung Exynos850 SoC specific data to enable pinctrl support for
all platforms based on Exynos850.

Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
---
 .../pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c    | 129 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.h      |  29 ++++
 drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c     |   2 +
 drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.h     |   1 +
 4 files changed, 161 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c
index b6e56422a700..9c71ff84ba7e 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c

@@ -40,6 +40,24 @@ static const struct samsung_pin_bank_type exynos5433_bank_type_alive = {
      .reg_offset = { 0x00, 0x04, 0x08, 0x0c, },
 };

+/*
+ * Bank type for non-alive type. Bit fields:
+ * CON: 4, DAT: 1, PUD: 4, DRV: 4, CONPDN: 2, PUDPDN: 4
+ */
+static struct samsung_pin_bank_type exynos850_bank_type_off  = {
+     .fld_width = { 4, 1, 4, 4, 2, 4, },
+     .reg_offset = { 0x00, 0x04, 0x08, 0x0c, 0x10, 0x14, },
+};
+
+/*
+ * Bank type for alive type. Bit fields:
+ * CON: 4, DAT: 1, PUD: 4, DRV: 4
+ */
+static struct samsung_pin_bank_type exynos850_bank_type_alive = {
+     .fld_width = { 4, 1, 4, 4, },
+     .reg_offset = { 0x00, 0x04, 0x08, 0x0c, },
+};
+
 /* Pad retention control code for accessing PMU regmap */
 static atomic_t exynos_shared_retention_refcnt;

@@ -422,3 +440,114 @@ const struct samsung_pinctrl_of_match_data exynos7_of_data __initconst = {
      .ctrl           = exynos7_pin_ctrl,
      .num_ctrl       = ARRAY_SIZE(exynos7_pin_ctrl),
 };
+
+/* pin banks of exynos850 pin-controller 0 (ALIVE) */
+static struct samsung_pin_bank_data exynos850_pin_banks0[] = {
+     /* Must start with EINTG banks, ordered by EINT group number. */
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0x000, "gpa0", 0x00),

Why EXYNOS9 not EXYNOS850? Is it really shared with 96xx, 98xx and 9x0
series?

Yeah, I double checked and those macros are actually used for 96xx
SoCs. So I suggest we leave it as is, as it seems to be related to the
whole architecture series, not only to Exynos850.

quoted

+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0x020, "gpa1", 0x04),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0x040, "gpa2", 0x08),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0x060, "gpa3", 0x0c),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTW(4, 0x080, "gpa4", 0x10),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTN(3, 0x0A0, "gpq0"),
+};
+
+/* pin banks of exynos850 pin-controller 1 (CMGP) */
+static struct samsung_pin_bank_data exynos850_pin_banks1[] = {
+     /* Must start with EINTG banks, ordered by EINT group number. */
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTW(1, 0x000, "gpm0", 0x00),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTW(1, 0x020, "gpm1", 0x04),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTW(1, 0x040, "gpm2", 0x08),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTW(1, 0x060, "gpm3", 0x0C),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTW(1, 0x080, "gpm4", 0x10),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTW(1, 0x0A0, "gpm5", 0x14),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTW(1, 0x0C0, "gpm6", 0x18),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTW(1, 0x0E0, "gpm7", 0x1C),
+};
+
+/* pin banks of exynos850 pin-controller 2 (AUD) */
+static struct samsung_pin_bank_data exynos850_pin_banks2[] = {
+     /* Must start with EINTG banks, ordered by EINT group number. */
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x000, "gpb0", 0x00),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x020, "gpb1", 0x04),
+};
+
+/* pin banks of exynos850 pin-controller 3 (HSI) */
+static struct samsung_pin_bank_data exynos850_pin_banks3[] = {
+     /* Must start with EINTG banks, ordered by EINT group number. */
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTG(6, 0x000, "gpf2", 0x00),
+};
+
+/* pin banks of exynos850 pin-controller 4 (CORE) */
+static struct samsung_pin_bank_data exynos850_pin_banks4[] = {
+     /* Must start with EINTG banks, ordered by EINT group number. */
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x000, "gpf0", 0x00),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x020, "gpf1", 0x04),
+};
+
+/* pin banks of exynos850 pin-controller 5 (PERI) */
+static struct samsung_pin_bank_data exynos850_pin_banks5[] = {
+     /* Must start with EINTG banks, ordered by EINT group number. */
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTG(2, 0x000, "gpg0", 0x00),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTG(6, 0x020, "gpp0", 0x04),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x040, "gpp1", 0x08),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x060, "gpp2", 0x0C),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x080, "gpg1", 0x10),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x0A0, "gpg2", 0x14),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTG(1, 0x0C0, "gpg3", 0x18),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTG(3, 0x0E0, "gpc0", 0x1C),
+     EXYNOS9_PIN_BANK_EINTG(6, 0x100, "gpc1", 0x20),
+};
+
+static const struct samsung_pin_ctrl exynos850_pin_ctrl[] __initconst = {
+     {
+             /* pin-controller instance 0 ALIVE data */
+             .pin_banks      = exynos850_pin_banks0,
+             .nr_banks       = ARRAY_SIZE(exynos850_pin_banks0),
+             .eint_gpio_init = exynos_eint_gpio_init,
+             .eint_wkup_init = exynos_eint_wkup_init,
+             .suspend        = exynos_pinctrl_suspend,
+             .resume         = exynos_pinctrl_resume,

I guess retention registers will follow sometime later.

Good point, never noticed retention control is needed for
suspend/resume to work properly. I will remove suspend/resume ops in
v2, and PM support will be sent later.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel