Re: [PATCH 00/12] Add minimal support for Exynos850 SoC
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Date: 2021-07-30 19:02:32
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, linux-samsung-soc, linux-serial, lkml
Hi Krzysztof, On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 at 20:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:
On 30/07/2021 17:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:quoted
On 30/07/2021 16:49, Sam Protsenko wrote:quoted
This patch series adds initial platform support for Samsung Exynos850 SoC [1]. With this patchset it's possible to run the kernel with BusyBox rootfs as a RAM disk. More advanced platform support (like MMC driver additions) will be added later. The idea is to keep the first submission minimal to ease the review, and then build up on top of that. [1] https://www.samsung.com/semiconductor/minisite/exynos/products/mobileprocessor/exynos-850/Great work!
Thanks, Krzysztof! And thank you for reviewing the whole series.
quoted
What's the SoC revision number (should be accessible via /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/)? Recent wrap in numbering of Exynos chips might bring confusion...
# cat /sys/devices/soc0/revision 0
Judging by vendor's sources it is quite confusing. It looks mostly like Exynos3830 but in few other cases it uses Exynos9 compatibles (Exynos9, Exynos9820). Only in few places there is Exynos850. Marketing department made it so confusing... The revision embedded in SoC would be very interesting.
As I understand, this SoC is called Exynos850 everywhere now. Exynos3830 is its old name, not used anymore. As you noticed from patch #2, it shares some definitions with Exynos9 SoC, so I guess some software is similar for both architectures. Not sure about hardware though, never worked with Exynos9 CPUs. Anyway, I asked Samsung representatives about naming, and it seems like we should stick to "Exynos850" name, even in code.
Anyway, judging by current versioning, there is a risk Samsung will come with a new chipset name conflicting with existing ones. It already overflowed. It's even worse with a thingy called "Exynos9 auto" which hides numbering even more. Best regards, Krzysztof
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel