On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 09:19:36AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:

On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:11:24 +0100
Jens Wiklander [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I used the -strict option.

./scripts/checkpatch.pl -strict 0001-tee-optee-add-invoke_fn-tracepoints.patch
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#44: 
new file mode 100644

The above is just asking for someone to take maintainership of the new file.

quoted

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#68: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:20:
+TRACE_EVENT(optee_invoke_fn_begin,
+	TP_PROTO(struct optee_rpc_param *param),

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#71: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:23:
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#76: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:28:
+	TP_fast_assign(

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#89: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:41:
+TRACE_EVENT(optee_invoke_fn_end,
+	TP_PROTO(struct optee_rpc_param *param, struct arm_smccc_res *res),

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#92: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:44:
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#97: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:49:
+	TP_fast_assign(

The TRACE_EVENT() macro is "special", and checkpatch notoriously stumbles
over it. I usually recommend that people ignore the checkpatch warnings on
TRACE_EVENT() macros.

Makes sense. I'll pick this up as it is.

Thanks,
Jens

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel