Re: [PATCH] tee: optee: add invoke_fn tracepoints
From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Date: 2021-02-23 13:12:34
Also in:
lkml, op-tee
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 06:40:26PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:59:22 +0100 Jens Wiklander wrote:quoted
Hi Jisheng,Hi Jens,quoted
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:44 AM Jisheng Zhang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Add tracepoints to retrieve information about the invoke_fn. This would help to measure how many invoke_fn are triggered and how long it takes to complete one invoke_fn call. Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <redacted> --- Since v1: - add BUILD_BUG_ON() macro usage to make sure that the size of what is being copied, is not smaller than the amount being copied. Thank Steve. - move optee_trace.h to keep include headers sorted drivers/tee/optee/call.c | 4 ++ drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h
[snip]
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7c954eefa4bf --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * optee trace points + * + * Copyright (C) 2021 Synaptics Incorporated + * Author: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> + */ + +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM +#define TRACE_SYSTEM optee + +#if !defined(_TRACE_OPTEE_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ) +#define _TRACE_OPTEE_H + +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h> +#include "optee_private.h" +Checkpatch has some complaints below. Is that something that could be fixed or is this so far from regular C-syntax that we don't care?I tried ./scripts/checkpatch.pl in Linus tree to check the patch, there's no any error, and except the "MAINTAINERS need updating" warning, there's no other warnings. git log -- scripts/checkpatch.pl shows the latest checkpatch.pl is at commit 62137364e3e8afcc745846c5c67cacf943149073 I'm not sure what happened.
I used the -strict option.
./scripts/checkpatch.pl -strict 0001-tee-optee-add-invoke_fn-tracepoints.patch
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#44:
new file mode 100644
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#68: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:20:
+TRACE_EVENT(optee_invoke_fn_begin,
+ TP_PROTO(struct optee_rpc_param *param),
CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#71: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:23:
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#76: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:28:
+ TP_fast_assign(
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#89: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:41:
+TRACE_EVENT(optee_invoke_fn_end,
+ TP_PROTO(struct optee_rpc_param *param, struct arm_smccc_res *res),
CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#92: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:44:
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#97: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:49:
+ TP_fast_assign(
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 6 checks, 86 lines checked
Thanks,
Jens
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel