Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 4 authors, 2021-03-25

Re: [PATCH] tee: optee: add invoke_fn tracepoints

From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Date: 2021-02-23 13:12:34
Also in: lkml, op-tee

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 06:40:26PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:59:22 +0100 Jens Wiklander wrote:

quoted
Hi Jisheng,
Hi Jens,
quoted
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:44 AM Jisheng Zhang
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Add tracepoints to retrieve information about the invoke_fn. This would
help to measure how many invoke_fn are triggered and how long it takes
to complete one invoke_fn call.

Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <redacted>
---

Since v1:
 - add BUILD_BUG_ON() macro usage to make sure that the size of what is being
   copied, is not smaller than the amount being copied. Thank Steve.
 - move optee_trace.h to keep include headers sorted

 drivers/tee/optee/call.c        |  4 ++
 drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h
[snip]
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7c954eefa4bf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * optee trace points
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 Synaptics Incorporated
+ * Author: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
+ */
+
+#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
+#define TRACE_SYSTEM optee
+
+#if !defined(_TRACE_OPTEE_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
+#define _TRACE_OPTEE_H
+
+#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
+#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
+#include "optee_private.h"
+  
Checkpatch has some complaints below. Is that something that could be
fixed or is this so far from regular C-syntax that we don't care?
I tried ./scripts/checkpatch.pl in Linus tree to check the patch, there's
no any error, and except the "MAINTAINERS need updating" warning, there's
no other warnings.

git log  -- scripts/checkpatch.pl
shows the latest checkpatch.pl is at commit 62137364e3e8afcc745846c5c67cacf943149073

I'm not sure what happened.
I used the -strict option.

./scripts/checkpatch.pl -strict 0001-tee-optee-add-invoke_fn-tracepoints.patch
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#44: 
new file mode 100644

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#68: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:20:
+TRACE_EVENT(optee_invoke_fn_begin,
+	TP_PROTO(struct optee_rpc_param *param),

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#71: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:23:
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#76: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:28:
+	TP_fast_assign(

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#89: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:41:
+TRACE_EVENT(optee_invoke_fn_end,
+	TP_PROTO(struct optee_rpc_param *param, struct arm_smccc_res *res),

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#92: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:44:
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(

CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
#97: FILE: drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h:49:
+	TP_fast_assign(

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 6 checks, 86 lines checked

Thanks,
Jens

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help