Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 4 authors, 2021-03-25

Re: [PATCH] tee: optee: add invoke_fn tracepoints

From: Jisheng Zhang <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-23 10:41:38
Also in: lkml, op-tee

On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:59:22 +0100 Jens Wiklander wrote:

Hi Jisheng,
Hi Jens,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:44 AM Jisheng Zhang
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Add tracepoints to retrieve information about the invoke_fn. This would
help to measure how many invoke_fn are triggered and how long it takes
to complete one invoke_fn call.

Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <redacted>
---

Since v1:
 - add BUILD_BUG_ON() macro usage to make sure that the size of what is being
   copied, is not smaller than the amount being copied. Thank Steve.
 - move optee_trace.h to keep include headers sorted

 drivers/tee/optee/call.c        |  4 ++
 drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h
diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/call.c b/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
index 780d7c4fd756..0da6fe50f1af 100644
--- a/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
+++ b/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include "optee_private.h"
 #include "optee_smc.h"
+#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
+#include "optee_trace.h"

 struct optee_call_waiter {
        struct list_head list_node;
@@ -138,9 +140,11 @@ u32 optee_do_call_with_arg(struct tee_context *ctx, phys_addr_t parg)
        while (true) {
                struct arm_smccc_res res;

+               trace_optee_invoke_fn_begin(&param);
                optee->invoke_fn(param.a0, param.a1, param.a2, param.a3,
                                 param.a4, param.a5, param.a6, param.a7,
                                 &res);
+               trace_optee_invoke_fn_end(&param, &res);

                if (res.a0 == OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_ETHREAD_LIMIT) {
                        /*
diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7c954eefa4bf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * optee trace points
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 Synaptics Incorporated
+ * Author: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
+ */
+
+#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
+#define TRACE_SYSTEM optee
+
+#if !defined(_TRACE_OPTEE_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
+#define _TRACE_OPTEE_H
+
+#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
+#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
+#include "optee_private.h"
+  
Checkpatch has some complaints below. Is that something that could be
fixed or is this so far from regular C-syntax that we don't care?
I tried ./scripts/checkpatch.pl in Linus tree to check the patch, there's
no any error, and except the "MAINTAINERS need updating" warning, there's
no other warnings.

git log  -- scripts/checkpatch.pl
shows the latest checkpatch.pl is at commit 62137364e3e8afcc745846c5c67cacf943149073

I'm not sure what happened.

Thanks
Thanks,
Jens
quoted
+TRACE_EVENT(optee_invoke_fn_begin,
+       TP_PROTO(struct optee_rpc_param *param),
+       TP_ARGS(param),
+
+       TP_STRUCT__entry(
+               __field(void *, param)
+               __array(u32, args, 8)
+       ),
+
+       TP_fast_assign(
+               __entry->param = param;
+               BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*param) < sizeof(__entry->args));
+               memcpy(__entry->args, param, sizeof(__entry->args));
+       ),
+
+       TP_printk("param=%p (%x, %x, %x, %x, %x, %x, %x, %x)", __entry->param,
+                 __entry->args[0], __entry->args[1], __entry->args[2],
+                 __entry->args[3], __entry->args[4], __entry->args[5],
+                 __entry->args[6], __entry->args[7])
+);
+
+TRACE_EVENT(optee_invoke_fn_end,
+       TP_PROTO(struct optee_rpc_param *param, struct arm_smccc_res *res),
+       TP_ARGS(param, res),
+
+       TP_STRUCT__entry(
+               __field(void *, param)
+               __array(unsigned long, rets, 4)
+       ),
+
+       TP_fast_assign(
+               __entry->param = param;
+               BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*res) < sizeof(__entry->rets));
+               memcpy(__entry->rets, res, sizeof(__entry->rets));
+       ),
+
+       TP_printk("param=%p ret (%lx, %lx, %lx, %lx)", __entry->param,
+                 __entry->rets[0], __entry->rets[1], __entry->rets[2],
+                 __entry->rets[3])
+);
+#endif /* _TRACE_OPTEE_H */
+
+#undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
+#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH .
+#undef TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE
+#define TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE optee_trace
+
+/* This part must be outside protection */
+#include <trace/define_trace.h>
--
2.30.0
 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help