On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:26:52 +0900
William Breathitt Gray [off-list ref] wrote:

On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 05:10:21PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 21:13:34 +0900
William Breathitt Gray [off-list ref] wrote:
  

quoted

ERANGE is a semantically better error code to return when an argument
value falls outside the supported limit range of a device.  

#define	ERANGE		34	/* Math result not representable */

Not generally applicable to a parameter being out of range
despite the name.
#define	EINVAL		22	/* Invalid argument */
Is probably closer to what we want to describe here.

Jonathan  

The comment for ERANGE in error-base.h may be terse to a fault. I
believe there's a connotation here provided by ERANGE that is absent
from EINVAL: primarily that the device buffer is incapable of supporting
the desired value (i.e. there is a hardware limitation).

This is why strtoul() returns ERANGE if the correct value is outside the
range of representable values: the result of the operation is valid in
theory (it would be an unsigned integer), but it cannot be returned to
the user due to a limitation of the hardware to support that value (e.g.
32-bit registers) [1].

The changes in this patch follow the same logic: these are arguments
that are valid in theory (e.g. they are unsigned integers), but the
underlying devices are incapable of processing such a value (e.g. the
104-QUAD-8 can only handle 24-bit values).

[1] https://stackoverflow.com/a/34981398/1806289

Its a bit of a stretch, but I can't claim to feel that strongly about
this.

Jonathan

William Breathitt Gray

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel