Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] regulator: dt-bindings: Document max8997-pmic nodes
From: Timon Baetz <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-15 06:20:17
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 16:16:53 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 03:16:48PM +0000, Timon Baetz wrote:quoted
Muic needs a node to be used with extcon_get_edev_by_phandle(). Charger needs a node to reference a regulator.The pattern is to use the parent device's node.
So is extcon going to be a self-reference then? Just for my understanding: I can see sub-nodes for MFD all over the place. It is still not clear to me why sub-nodes aren't the right choice in this specific case? Thanks for the feedback, Timon _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel