Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 6 authors, 2021-01-18

Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] regulator: dt-bindings: Document max8997-pmic nodes

From: Timon Baetz <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-15 06:20:17
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc, lkml

On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 16:16:53 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 03:16:48PM +0000, Timon Baetz wrote:
quoted
Muic needs a node to be used with extcon_get_edev_by_phandle().
Charger needs a node to reference a regulator.  
The pattern is to use the parent device's node.
So is extcon going to be a self-reference then?

Just for my understanding: I can see sub-nodes for MFD all over the
place. It is still not clear to me why sub-nodes aren't the right
choice in this specific case?

Thanks for the feedback,
Timon


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help