Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 6 authors, 2021-01-18

Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] regulator: dt-bindings: Document max8997-pmic nodes

From: Timon Baetz <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-15 06:20:17
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-samsung-soc, lkml

On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 16:16:53 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 03:16:48PM +0000, Timon Baetz wrote:
quoted
Muic needs a node to be used with extcon_get_edev_by_phandle().
Charger needs a node to reference a regulator.  
The pattern is to use the parent device's node.
So is extcon going to be a self-reference then?

Just for my understanding: I can see sub-nodes for MFD all over the
place. It is still not clear to me why sub-nodes aren't the right
choice in this specific case?

Thanks for the feedback,
Timon
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help