Hi Rob, Grygorii,

On 27/11/20 7:53 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote:

On 09:46-20201124, Sekhar Nori wrote:

quoted

On 24/11/20 6:51 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:

quoted

On 09:45-20201123, Sekhar Nori wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

The main reason I commented - is hope to get some clarification from DT maintainers.
90% of interrupt-controller nodes do not have #address-cells and I never seen in in GPIO nodes
(most often is present in PCI and GIC nodes).
and nobody seems fixing it. So, if we are going to move this direction it's reasonable to get clarification to be sure.

And there is no "never" here - #address-cells always can be added if really required.

OK - as a GPIO node, but as an interrupt-controller node, I was
looking at [1] and wondering if that was the precedence.

Yes, will be good to get direction from the DT maintainers on this
topic.

Is there a conclusion on this topic?  Without adding address-cells for interrupt
controller we will be introducing new warning for all the new nodes we are adding.

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel