On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:18 AM Pavel Machek [off-list ref] wrote:

...

quoted

quoted

quoted

+enum {
+       MT6360_LED_ISNK1 = 0,
+       MT6360_LED_ISNK2,
+       MT6360_LED_ISNK3,
+       MT6360_LED_ISNK4,
+       MT6360_LED_FLASH1,
+       MT6360_LED_FLASH2,

quoted

+       MT6360_MAX_LEDS,

No comma for terminator entry.

ACK

Actually, that comma is fine. Its absence would be fine, too.

It is slightly better not to have to prevent (theoretical) rebase or
other similar issues when a new item can go behind the terminator. In
such a case compiler can easily tell you if something is wrong.

quoted

quoted

quoted

+};

...

quoted

quoted

quoted

+static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused mt6360_led_of_id[] = {
+       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6360-led", },

quoted

+       {},

No need comma.

ACK

It is also no hurting comma.

Same explanation. It doesn't hurt per se, but its absence might serve a purpose.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel