Re: [PATCH 20/35] arm64: mte: Add in-kernel MTE helpers
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: 2020-09-08 17:12:32
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 03:23:20PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:38 AM Catalin Marinas [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 07:27:02PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h index 1c99fcadb58c..733be1cb5c95 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h@@ -5,14 +5,19 @@ #ifndef __ASM_MTE_H #define __ASM_MTE_H -#define MTE_GRANULE_SIZE UL(16) +#include <asm/mte_asm.h>So the reason for this move is to include it in asm/cache.h. Fine by me but...quoted
#define MTE_GRANULE_MASK (~(MTE_GRANULE_SIZE - 1)) #define MTE_TAG_SHIFT 56 #define MTE_TAG_SIZE 4 +#define MTE_TAG_MASK GENMASK((MTE_TAG_SHIFT + (MTE_TAG_SIZE - 1)), MTE_TAG_SHIFT) +#define MTE_TAG_MAX (MTE_TAG_MASK >> MTE_TAG_SHIFT)... I'd rather move all these definitions in a file with a more meaningful name like mte-def.h. The _asm implies being meant for .S files inclusion which isn't the case.quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c index eb39504e390a..e2d708b4583d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c@@ -72,6 +74,47 @@ int memcmp_pages(struct page *page1, struct page *page2) return ret; } +u8 mte_get_mem_tag(void *addr) +{ + if (system_supports_mte()) + addr = mte_assign_valid_ptr_tag(addr);The mte_assign_valid_ptr_tag() is slightly misleading. All it does is read the allocation tag from memory. I also think this should be inline asm, possibly using alternatives. It's just an LDG instruction (and it saves us from having to invent a better function name).Could you point me to an example of inline asm with alternatives if there's any? I see alternative_if and other similar macros used in arch/arm64/ code, is that what you mean? Those seem to always use static conditions, like config values, but here we have a dynamic system_supports_mte(). Could you elaborate on how I should implement this?
There are plenty of ALTERNATIVE macro uses under arch/arm64, see
arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative.h for the definition and some simple
documentation.
In this case, something like (untested, haven't even checked whether it
matches the mte_assign_valid_ptr_tag() code):
asm(ALTERNATIVE("orr %0, %1, #0xff << 56", "ldg %0, [%1]", ARM64_HAS_MTE));
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel