Thread (101 messages) 101 messages, 6 authors, 2020-09-18

Re: [PATCH 24/35] arm64: mte: Switch GCR_EL1 in kernel entry and exit

From: Andrey Konovalov <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-08 16:38:05
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:16 PM Catalin Marinas [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:56:49AM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
quoted
On 8/27/20 11:38 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 07:27:06PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
index 7717ea9bc2a7..cfac7d02f032 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
@@ -18,10 +18,14 @@

 #include <asm/barrier.h>
 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
+#include <asm/kasan.h>
+#include <asm/kprobes.h>
 #include <asm/mte.h>
 #include <asm/ptrace.h>
 #include <asm/sysreg.h>

+u64 gcr_kernel_excl __read_mostly;
Could we make this __ro_after_init?
Yes, it makes sense, it should be updated only once through mte_init_tags().

Something to consider though here is that this might not be the right approach
if in future we want to add stack tagging. In such a case we need to know the
kernel exclude mask before any C code is executed. Initializing the mask via
mte_init_tags() it is too late.
It depends on how stack tagging ends up in the kernel, whether it uses
ADDG/SUBG or not. If it's only IRG, I think it can cope with changing
the GCR_EL1.Excl in the middle of a function.
quoted
I was thinking to add a compilation define instead of having gcr_kernel_excl in
place. This might not work if the kernel excl mask is meant to change during the
execution.
A macro with the default value works for me. That's what it basically is
currently, only that it ends up in a variable.
Some thoughts on the topic: gcr_kernel_excl is currently initialized
in mte_init_tags() and depends on the max_tag value dynamically
provided to it, so it's not something that can be expressed with a
define. In the case of KASAN the max_tag value is static, but if we
rely on that we make core MTE code depend on KASAN, which doesn't seem
right from the design perspective.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help