On 8/27/20 11:45 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:

On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 07:27:13PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:

quoted

diff --git a/mm/kasan/mte.c b/mm/kasan/mte.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..43b7d74161e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mm/kasan/mte.c

Since this is an arm64-specific kasan backend, I wonder whether it makes
more sense to keep it under arch/arm64 (mte-kasan.c).

Yes I agree, I had a similar comment in patch 25. I think we should implement
the mte backend entirely in arch code because other architectures might want to
enable the feature (e.g. Sparc ADI).

quoted

diff --git a/mm/kasan/report_mte.c b/mm/kasan/report_mte.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..dbbf3aaa8798
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mm/kasan/report_mte.c

Same for this one.

-- 
Regards,
Vincenzo

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel