Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 4 authors, 2020-07-02

Re: [PATCH V4 3/5] clk: imx: Support building i.MX common clock driver as module

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2020-07-02 07:43:26
Also in: linux-clk, lkml

On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:12 AM Anson Huang [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The question is whether the #ifdef check in the header to test for MODULE
(only calling it if this particular soc has a built-in clk driver, which is sufficient)
or for IS_MODULE(CONFIG_MXC_CLK) (call it if _any_ clk driver is built-in and
the function exists, which leaves extra code in the driver but is a more
conventional check).
So you prefer to add an empty inline function for imx_register_uart_clocks() with check
of MODULE build?
Yes, I want the empty inline stub, but either symbol check would work
Even with this, we still need to add MODULE build check to whole block
of this earlycon uart clock handler in imx/clk.c.
Correct.

      Arnd

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help