RE: [PATCH V4 5/5] clk: imx8qxp: Support building i.MX8QXP clock driver as module
From: Anson Huang <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-02 03:55:10
Also in:
linux-clk, lkml
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 5/5] clk: imx8qxp: Support building i.MX8QXP clock driver as module On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:20 AM Anson Huang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Change configuration to "tristate", use device_initcall() instead of builtin_platform_driver(), add module author, description and license to support building i.MX8QXP clock drivers as module. Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <redacted> --- Changes since V3: - use device_initcall() instead of builtin_platform_driver(); - add module author/description; - link common scu/lpcg clock driver to i.MX8QXP clock driver, then no need to have exports. --- drivers/clk/imx/Kconfig | 6 +++--- drivers/clk/imx/Makefile | 9 ++++----- drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8qxp-lpcg.c | 10 +++++++++- drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8qxp.c | 11 ++++++++++- 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/imx/Kconfig index1867111..8340dfe 100644--- a/drivers/clk/imx/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/Kconfig@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ config MXC_CLK depends on ARCH_MXC config MXC_CLK_SCU - bool - depends on IMX_SCU + tristate "IMX SCU clock" + depends on ARCH_MXC && IMX_SCU config CLK_IMX1 bool "IMX1 CCM Clock Driver"@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ config CLK_IMX8MQ Build the driver for i.MX8MQ CCM Clock Driver config CLK_IMX8QXP - bool "IMX8QXP SCU Clock" + tristate "IMX8QXP SCU Clock" depends on ARCH_MXC && IMX_SCU && ARM64 select MXC_CLK_SCU helpdiff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile index17f5d12..79e53f2 100644--- a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile@@ -21,15 +21,14 @@ mxc-clk-objs += clk-pll14xx.o mxc-clk-objs +=clk-sscg-pll.o obj-$(CONFIG_MXC_CLK) += mxc-clk.o -obj-$(CONFIG_MXC_CLK_SCU) += \ - clk-scu.o \ - clk-lpcg-scu.o - obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MM) += clk-imx8mm.o obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MN) += clk-imx8mn.o obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MP) += clk-imx8mp.o obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MQ) += clk-imx8mq.o -obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8QXP) += clk-imx8qxp.o clk-imx8qxp-lpcg.o + +obj-$(CONFIG_MXC_CLK_SCU) += clk-imx-scu.o clk-imx-lpcg-scu.o +clk-imx-scu-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8QXP) += clk-scu.o clk-imx8qxp.o +clk-imx-lpcg-scu-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8QXP) += clk-lpcg-scu.o +clk-imx8qxp-lpcg.o obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX1) += clk-imx1.o obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX21) += clk-imx21.o diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8qxp-lpcg.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8qxp-lpcg.c index 04c8ee3..5b6648e 100644--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8qxp-lpcg.c +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8qxp-lpcg.c@@ -231,4 +231,12 @@ static struct platform_driverimx8qxp_lpcg_clk_driver = {quoted
.probe = imx8qxp_lpcg_clk_probe, }; -builtin_platform_driver(imx8qxp_lpcg_clk_driver); +static int __init imx8qxp_lpcg_clk_init(void)Does __init work for module?
__init is NOT working/necessary for module, but if the driver is built-in, it is better to have it, checked other drivers which support module build, they all have it, so I think it is better to keep it especially when the driver supports both built-in and loadable module. drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sdm845.c drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8939.c
quoted
+{ + return platform_driver_register(&imx8qxp_lpcg_clk_driver); +} +device_initcall(imx8qxp_lpcg_clk_init);Any reason to change to device_initcall which looks a bit strange? Is it because the following line? +obj-$(CONFIG_MXC_CLK_SCU) += clk-imx-scu.o clk-imx-lpcg-scu.o But it looks to me they're still two modules. Aren't they?
It is suggested by Arnd to NOT use builtin_platform_driver(), in order to support module unload, although the clock driver normally does NOT support remove, but it is better to follow the right way. The change in Makefile is just to link scu/lpcg library to i.MX8QXP clk driver, so that we can get rid of exports and below 2 .ko are needed for all i.MX SoCs with SCU inside as per your saying of i.MX8QXP clock driver can be extended for future SoCs with SCU. clk-imx-lpcg-scu.ko clk-imx-scu.ko Thanks, Anson _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel