RE: [PATCH V4 3/5] clk: imx: Support building i.MX common clock driver as module
From: Anson Huang <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-02 06:42:37
Also in:
linux-clk, lkml
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/5] clk: imx: Support building i.MX common clock driver as module On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 2:11 PM Anson Huang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/5] clk: imx: Support building i.MX common clock driver as module On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:26 AM Anson Huang [off-list ref] wrote: [...]quoted
quoted
quoted
@@ -143,16 +148,18 @@ void imx_cscmr1_fixup(u32 *val) staticint imx_keep_uart_clocks; static struct clk ** const *imx_uart_clocks; -static int __init imx_keep_uart_clocks_param(char *str) +static int __maybe_unused imx_keep_uart_clocks_param(char +*str) { imx_keep_uart_clocks = 1; return 0; } +#ifndef MODULE __setup_param("earlycon", imx_keep_uart_earlycon, imx_keep_uart_clocks_param, 0); __setup_param("earlyprintk", imx_keep_uart_earlyprintk, imx_keep_uart_clocks_param, 0);I feel not only the __setup_param, the whole logic of keep_uart_clocks are not needed for Module case. Is it true?Yes, but the 'keep_uart_clocks' is false by default and the function imx_keep_uart_clocks_param() already has '__maybe_unused', it does NOT impact anything if it is for module build, so I did NOT add the #ifndef checkfor them, just to keep code easy and clean.quoted
IMHO do not compile them is a more easy and clean way. Then users don't have to look into the code logic which is meaingless for Module case. BTW, it really does not make any sense to only condionally compile __setup_parm() but left the param functions definition to be handled by __maybe_unnused. They're together part of code, aren't they?I am fine of adding the '#ifndef MODULE' to imx_clk_disable_uart() and imx_keep_uart_clocks_param() as well in next patch series. Others like ' imx_keep_uart_clocks ' and imx_register_uart_clocks() need to be keptalways built, since they are used by each clock driver no matter built-in or module build.quoted
So that means I have to add another 'ifndef MODULE' or I need to adjust some code sequence to make those code can be built-out in same block and just use single 'ifndef MODULE', I think adjust the code sequenceshould be better, will go with this way. What if we condionally compile it in clk.h? Will that be easiser?
Adjust the function sequence looks like NOT complicated, just need to exchange the imx_register_uart_clocks() and imx_clk_disable_uart(), then I can use single '#ifndef MODULE', will go with this way in V5. Anson _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel