On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 08:43:10AM +0000, Robin Gong wrote:

On 2020/03/10 Sascha Hauer [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:31:56PM +0800, Robin Gong wrote:

quoted

ERR009165 fixed on i.mx6ul/6ull/6sll. All other i.mx6/7 and i.mx8m/8mm
still need this errata. Please refer to nxp official errata document
from

https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nx
p.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cyibin.gong%40nxp.com%7Cf73bfc11a68c4
2f5f6d308d7c4c96efa%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C1%7C
637194241755109112&sdata=xzIUP8qZkrlDXX0yjTcUNZB6zDrevTdHFg1o4
PZZd8E%3D&reserved=0 .

quoted

For removing workaround on those chips. Add new i.mx6ul type.

Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <redacted>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-imx.c | 50
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c index

842a86e..f7ee2ec 100644

--- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c

@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ enum spi_imx_devtype {
 	IMX35_CSPI,	/* CSPI on all i.mx except above */
 	IMX51_ECSPI,	/* ECSPI on i.mx51 */
 	IMX53_ECSPI,	/* ECSPI on i.mx53 and later */
+	IMX6UL_ECSPI,	/* ERR009165 fix from i.mx6ul */
 };

 struct spi_imx_data;

@@ -75,6 +76,11 @@ struct spi_imx_devtype_data {
 	bool has_slavemode;
 	unsigned int fifo_size;
 	bool dynamic_burst;
+	/*
+	 * ERR009165 fixed or not:
+	 *

https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nx
p.com%2Fdocs%2Fen%2Ferrata%2FIMX6DQCE.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cyi
bin.gong%40nxp.com%7Cf73bfc11a68c42f5f6d308d7c4c96efa%7C686ea1d3bc
2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C1%7C637194241755109112&sdata=m
uw4HL5nMDjREJwVd885Wrxka0moMaaZ%2BhJgsAgY3eo%3D&reserved=
0

quoted

+	 */
+	bool tx_glitch_fixed;
 	enum spi_imx_devtype devtype;
 };

@@ -128,7 +134,8 @@ static inline int is_imx35_cspi(struct

spi_imx_data *d)

 static inline int is_imx51_ecspi(struct spi_imx_data *d)  {
-	return d->devtype_data->devtype == IMX51_ECSPI;
+	return d->devtype_data->devtype == IMX51_ECSPI ||
+	       d->devtype_data->devtype == IMX6UL_ECSPI;
 }

Erm, no. A i.MX51 ECSPI is a i.MX51 ECSPI and not a i.MX6UL ECSPI. If you want
to handle them equally somewhere then explicitly test for i.MX6ul *and*
i.MX51 there.

But all i.mx6 chips including i.MX53 ECSPI are almost same as i.MX51 ECSPI, and ERR00915 is fixed from i.mx6ul....

You introduce .devtype = IMX6UL_ECSPI in this series, so apparently it
is *not* the same as IMX51_ECSPI, then please also don't introduce a
function which claims they are the same.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel