Re: [PATCH 0/4] Cleanup arm64 driver dependencies
From: Amit Kucheria <hidden>
Date: 2019-09-12 09:47:32
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-gpio, linux-pci, linux-pm, lkml
Hi Arnd, On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 2:59 PM Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 12:18 AM Amit Kucheria [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
I was using initcall_debugging on a QCOM platform and ran across a bunch of driver initcalls that are enabled even if their SoC support is disabled. Here are some fixups for a subset of them.The idea seems reasonable, disabling a platform may just turn off all the drivers that are not useful elsewhere, but there are mistakes in a lot of your changes, so I'm certainly not applying these for 5.4.
OK, thanks for confirming that you have no objections to such changes, per-se. I'll spend some more time ensuring COMPILE_TEST coverage for these cleanups. I only focused on quickly cleaning up my initcall_debug output for now.
Generally speaking, the way that works best is
config SUBSYS_DRIVER_FOO
tristate "SUBSYS support for FOO platform"
depends on ARCH_FOO || COMPILE_TEST
depends on SUBSYS
default "m" if ARCH_FOO
This means it's enabled as a loadable module by default (use
default "y" instead where necessary) as long as the platform
is enabled, but an x86 allmodconfig build also includes it
because of COMPILE_TEST, while any configuration without
ARCH_FOO that is not compile-testing cannot enable it.How would you like to handle defconfigs which list a driver explicitly? Should we add ARCH_FOO to those defconfigs or remove DRIVER_FOO from them? Regards, Amit _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel