[PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI NOR flash memories
From: Boris Brezillon <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-22 09:09:24
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 08:32:21 +0000 Yogesh Narayan Gaur [off-list ref] wrote:
HI,quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon at bootlin.com] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 1:32 PM To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <redacted> Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <redacted>; Tudor Ambarus [off-list ref]; marek.vasut at gmail.com; dwmw2 at infradead.org; computersforpeace at gmail.com; richard at nod.at; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; nicolas.ferre at microchip.com; cyrille.pitchen at microchip.com; linux-mtd at lists.infradead.org; linux-arm- kernel at lists.infradead.org; Cristian.Birsan at microchip.com; Mark Brown [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI NOR flash memories On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 06:04:13 +0000 Yogesh Narayan Gaur [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
-static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt) +static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const +u32 *smpt, u32 smpt_len) { const u32 *ret = NULL; - u32 i, addr; + u32 i, addr, nmaps; int err; u8 addr_width, read_opcode, read_dummy; u8 read_data_mask, data_byte, map_id; + bool map_id_is_valid = false; addr_width = nor->addr_width; read_dummy = nor->read_dummy; read_opcode = nor->read_opcode; + for (i = 0; i<smpt_len; i++) + pr_info("%s:%i smpt[%d]=%08x\n", __func__, __LINE__, + i, smpt[i]); + map_id = 0; - i = 0; /* Determine if there are any optional Detection Command Descriptors */ - while (!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP)) { + for (i = 0; i< smpt_len; i++) { + if (!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP)) + break; + read_data_mask = SMPT_CMD_READ_DATA(smpt[i]); nor->addr_width = spi_nor_smpt_addr_width(nor, smpt[i]); nor->read_dummy = spi_nor_smpt_read_dummy(nor, smpt[i]);Could you also print the ->addr_width, ->read_dummy and ->read_opcode here?It didn't showing any print messages here, did above line " if (!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP))" also needs to be changes to " if ((smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP))"?
Yes.
Below is the log, with the suggested change of modifying asquoted
+ for (nmaps = 0; nmaps< smpt_len; nmaps++) { + if((smpt[nmaps] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP))[ 1.625992] m25p80 spi0.0: found s25fl512s, expected m25p80 [ 1.631681] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[0]=08ff65fc [ 1.636988] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[1]=00000004 [ 1.642292] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[2]=04ff65fc [ 1.647596] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[3]=00000002 [ 1.652898] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[4]=02ff65fd [ 1.658200] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[5]=00000004 [ 1.663503] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[6]=ff0201fe [ 1.668806] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[7]=00007ff1 [ 1.674108] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[8]=00037ff4 [ 1.679412] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[9]=03fbfff4 [ 1.684715] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[10]=ff0203fe [ 1.690105] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[11]=03fbfff4 [ 1.695495] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[12]=00037ff4 [ 1.700886] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[13]=00007ff1 [ 1.706275] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[14]=ff0005ff [ 1.711664] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[15]=03fffff4 [ 1.717053] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2910 NO map_id [ 1.721777] m25p80 spi0.0: s25fl512s (65536 Kbytes) Didn't throw any return error. -- Regards, Yogesh Gaurquoted
quoted
@@ -2894,18 +2900,35 @@ static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(structspi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt)quoted
* Configuration that is currently in use. */ map_id = map_id << 1 | !!(data_byte & read_data_mask); + map_id_is_valid = true; i = i + 2; }