[PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI NOR flash memories
From: Boris Brezillon <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-17 09:52:54
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
memory technology devices (mtd), spi nor subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra, Pratyush Yadav, Michael Walle, Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:46:30 +0000 Yogesh Narayan Gaur [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Boris,quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon at bootlin.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:00 PM To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <redacted> Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <redacted>; Tudor Ambarus [off-list ref]; marek.vasut at gmail.com; dwmw2 at infradead.org; computersforpeace at gmail.com; richard at nod.at; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; nicolas.ferre at microchip.com; cyrille.pitchen at microchip.com; linux-mtd at lists.infradead.org; linux-arm- kernel at lists.infradead.org; Cristian.Birsan at microchip.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI NOR flash memories On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:10:45 +0200 Boris Brezillon [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:07:24 +0200 Boris Brezillon [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 02:07:43 +0000 Yogesh Narayan Gaur [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
Actually there is no entry of s25fs512s in current spi-nor.c file. For my connected flash part, jedec ID read points to s25fl512s. I have asked my board team to confirm the name of exact connected flash part. When I check the data sheet of s25fs512s, it also points to the same Jedec ID information. { "s25fl512s", INFO(0x010220, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 256, ....} But as stated earlier, if I skip reading SFDP or read using 1-1-1 protocol then read are always correct. For 1-4-4 protocol read are wrong and on further debugging found that Read code of 0x6C is being send as opcode instead of 0xEC. If I revert this patch, reads are working fine.Can you try with the following patch?Hm, nevermind. The problem is actually not related to 4B vs non-4B mode but 1-1-4 vs 1-4-4 modes.Yes, that's only I have stated in my first mail that instead of 1-4-4 mode read opcode is being sent for 1-1-4 mode.quoted
quoted
Can you try with this patch applied?With suggested patch, read for protocol 1-4-4 working correctly. [ 1.625360] m25p80 spi0.0: found s25fl512s, expected m25p80 [ 1.631094] m25p80 spi0.0: failed to parse SMPT (err = -22) [ 1.636661] 261 8c4c780 opcode(read:eb, pp:2, erase:d8) [ 1.641878] 266 8c4c780 opcode(read:ec, pp:12, erase:dc) [ 1.647200] m25p80 spi0.0: s25fl512s (65536 Kbytes)
Okay, let's try this one to see why the SMPT parsing fails. --->8---
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
index 9407ca5f9443..564882c87641 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c@@ -2855,23 +2855,31 @@ static u8 spi_nor_smpt_read_dummy(const struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 settings) * spi_nor_get_map_in_use() - get the configuration map in use * @nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor' * @smpt: pointer to the sector map parameter table + * @smpt_len: number of entries in the smpt array */ -static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt) +static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt, + u32 smpt_len) { const u32 *ret = NULL; - u32 i, addr; + u32 i, addr, nmaps; int err; u8 addr_width, read_opcode, read_dummy; u8 read_data_mask, data_byte, map_id; + bool map_id_is_valid = false; addr_width = nor->addr_width; read_dummy = nor->read_dummy; read_opcode = nor->read_opcode; + for (i = 0; i < smpt_len; i++) + pr_info("%s:%i smpt[%d] = %08x\n", __func__, __LINE__, i, smpt[i]); + map_id = 0; - i = 0; /* Determine if there are any optional Detection Command Descriptors */ - while (!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP)) { + for (i = 0; i < smpt_len; i++) { + if (!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP)) + break; + read_data_mask = SMPT_CMD_READ_DATA(smpt[i]); nor->addr_width = spi_nor_smpt_addr_width(nor, smpt[i]); nor->read_dummy = spi_nor_smpt_read_dummy(nor, smpt[i]);
@@ -2887,18 +2895,40 @@ static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt) * Configuration that is currently in use. */ map_id = map_id << 1 | !!(data_byte & read_data_mask); + map_id_is_valid = true; i = i + 2; } + if (map_id_is_valid) + pr_info("%s:%i map_id = %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, map_id); + else + pr_info("%s:%i no map_id\n", __func__, __LINE__); + /* Find the matching configuration map */ - while (SMPT_MAP_ID(smpt[i]) != map_id) { - if (smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_END) - goto out; + for (nmaps = 0; i < smpt_len; nmaps++) { + if (!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP)) + continue; + + if (!map_id_is_valid) { + /* + * Command descriptors are optional but if we didn't + * find any, we should ensure we have only one map. + */ + if (nmaps) { + ret = NULL; + break; + } + + ret = smpt + i; + } else if (map_id == SMPT_MAP_ID(smpt[i])) { + ret = smpt + i; + break; + } + /* increment the table index to the next map */ i += SMPT_MAP_REGION_COUNT(smpt[i]) + 1; } - ret = smpt + i; /* fall through */ out: nor->addr_width = addr_width;
@@ -3020,7 +3050,7 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_smpt(struct spi_nor *nor, for (i = 0; i < smpt_header->length; i++) smpt[i] = le32_to_cpu(smpt[i]); - sector_map = spi_nor_get_map_in_use(nor, smpt); + sector_map = spi_nor_get_map_in_use(nor, smpt, smpt_header->length); if (!sector_map) { ret = -EINVAL; goto out;
@@ -3132,6 +3162,17 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_sfdp(struct spi_nor *nor, switch (SFDP_PARAM_HEADER_ID(param_header)) { case SFDP_SECTOR_MAP_ID: err = spi_nor_parse_smpt(nor, param_header); + if (err) { + dev_warn(dev, + "failed to parse SMPT (err = %d)\n", + err); + /* + * SMPT parsing is optional, let's not drop + * all information we extracted so far just + * because it failed. + */ + err = 0; + } break; default: