Thread (36 messages) 36 messages, 6 authors, 2018-09-14

[PATCH i2c-next v6] i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events properly

From: clg@kaod.org (Cédric Le Goater)
Date: 2018-09-13 17:35:46
Also in: linux-aspeed, linux-i2c, lkml, openbmc

On 09/13/2018 05:57 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 05:48:59PM +0200, C?dric Le Goater wrote:
quoted
On 09/13/2018 03:33 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
[ ... ]
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
? /*
?? * The state machine needs some refinement. It is only used to track
?? * invalid STOP commands for the moment.
@@ -188,7 +215,7 @@ static void aspeed_i2c_bus_handle_cmd(AspeedI2CBus *bus, uint64_t value)
? {
????? bus->cmd &= ~0xFFFF;
????? bus->cmd |= value & 0xFFFF;
-??? bus->intr_status = 0;> +??? bus->intr_status &= I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE;
it deserves a comment to understand which scenario we are trying to handle.
?? 
Ok. FWIW, I wonder if intr_status should be touched here in the first place,
but I neither have the hardware nor a datasheet, so I don't know if any bits
are auto-cleared.
I just pushed a patch on my branch with some more explanation : 

	https://github.com/legoater/qemu/commits/aspeed-3.1
That seems to suggest that none of the status bits auto-clears, and that
the above code clearing intr_status should be removed entirely.
Am I missing something ?
You are right. I just pushed another version of the previous patch with this 
new hunk :
@@ -188,7 +200,6 @@ static void aspeed_i2c_bus_handle_cmd(As
 {
     bus->cmd &= ~0xFFFF;
     bus->cmd |= value & 0xFFFF;
-    bus->intr_status = 0;
 
     if (bus->cmd & I2CD_M_START_CMD) {
         uint8_t state = aspeed_i2c_get_state(bus) & I2CD_MACTIVE ?

The QEMU palmetto and witherspoon machines seem to behave fine. Can you give 
it a try ?

Thanks,

C.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help