[PATCH v3 00/23] Add multi-channel support to Armada thermal driver
From: edubezval@gmail.com (Eduardo Valentin)
Date: 2018-07-26 22:14:24
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pm
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 02:35:18PM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 02:14:43PM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:quoted
Hello, On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:00:41AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:quoted
On ?, 2018-07-25 at 09:52 +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:quoted
Hi Eduardo, Zhang, Miquel Raynal [off-list ref] wrote on Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:28:49 +0200:quoted
Hi Eduardo, Miquel Raynal [off-list ref] wrote on Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:41:43 +0200:quoted
The only capability of the Armada thermal driver is currently just to read one sensor (the default one) per AP and one per CP. Actually, there is one sensor per core in the AP806 plus one sensor in the thermal IP itself. The CP110 just features one thermal sensor in its own thermal IP. This series first improves the readability of this driver, then adds support for multi-channel thermal IPs. The bindings and the device-trees are updated accordingly. Thank you, Miqu?l??I know I sent this series on monday but there was almost no change on it (see below), do you think you will have the time to look at it before it's too late for the merge window?I know a little bit what it is to be on the maintainer side of a subsystem but these changes are laying since April, 21st and I really expect to get them merged. Zhang, as Eduardo seems to be overloaded this release, could you please take the series? Of course if there are things to address I'll be happy to do so.I had a sync with Eduardo during last merge window, and we agreed to send separate git pull requests to Linus since this release and see how it works. This means that all the soc thermal driver patches should go to Eduardo' tree and then Linus' tree directly. Anyway, let's ping Eduardo and see if he can review/take the patches.Sorry fellows, but I was off camping in a place with no electricity/no internet. I looked at this series before, and I do not remember anything that could block it to go. Let me restart on working on it.Let me take that back. I got some compilation error.
Given that I let this one fall into the cracks and that these are minor issues, I fixed them manually, and applied up to patch 19. But next at least compile test your series and run checkpatch on them. Patches 20-23 need to go via your arch tree.
quoted
quoted
thanks, ruiquoted
Thanks, Miqu?l