[PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: imx6qdl: add missing compatible and clock properties for EPIT
From: Clément Péron <hidden>
Date: 2018-06-04 09:10:43
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
Hi Vladimir, On Thu, 31 May 2018 at 10:54, Vladimir Zapolskiy [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Cl?ment, On 05/31/2018 11:41 AM, Cl?ment P?ron wrote:quoted
Hi Vladimir, On Thu, 31 May 2018 at 10:33, Vladimir Zapolskiy [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 05/30/2018 03:03 PM, Cl?ment P?ron wrote:quoted
From: Colin Didier <redacted> Add missing compatible and clock properties for EPIT node. Signed-off-by: Colin Didier <redacted> Signed-off-by: Cl?ment Peron <redacted> Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <redacted> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi index c003e62bf290..0feec516847a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi@@ -844,13 +844,23 @@ }; epit1: epit at 20d0000 { /* EPIT1 */epit1: timer at 20d0000 { ... And /* EPIT1 */ comment can be removed, it is quite clear from the same line context. Formally it is a subject to another patch, but I think this can be accepted as a part of this one.Should I also update other boards ? I only did it for imx6qdl.dtsi, but the EPIT is present in other boards but i can't test it myself.Sure, please do it, why not, it is quite a safe modification. One change per one dtsi file will suffice, and I see that imx25.dtsi already contains the requested change, however probably you may want to update its compatible = "fsl,imx25-epit" line. Regarding compatibles for other imx6* SoCs, I think all of them should be documented in fsl,imxepit.txt and then added to the correspondent dtsi files one per SoC.
Nvidia UART doc did this :
- For other Tegra, must contain '"nvidia,<chip>-uart",
"nvidia,tegra20-uart"' where <chip> is tegra30, tegra114, tegra124,
I will follow this.
And I forgot the outcome of one former discussion with Uwe Kleine-K?nig,
but if my bad memory serves me, we agreed that i.MX25 was released later
than i.MX31, so the most generic (the last value in the list) compatible
should be a compatible with i.MX31 like in
imx25.dtsi:367: compatible = "fsl,imx25-gpt", "fsl,imx31-gpt";
--
With best wishes,
VladimirRegards, Clement