Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 3 authors, 2018-06-04

[PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: imx6qdl: add missing compatible and clock properties for EPIT

From: Clément Péron <hidden>
Date: 2018-06-04 09:10:43
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

Hi Vladimir,

On Thu, 31 May 2018 at 10:54, Vladimir Zapolskiy
[off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Cl?ment,

On 05/31/2018 11:41 AM, Cl?ment P?ron wrote:
quoted
Hi Vladimir,

On Thu, 31 May 2018 at 10:33, Vladimir Zapolskiy
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 05/30/2018 03:03 PM, Cl?ment P?ron wrote:
quoted
From: Colin Didier <redacted>

Add missing compatible and clock properties for EPIT node.

Signed-off-by: Colin Didier <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Cl?ment Peron <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
index c003e62bf290..0feec516847a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
@@ -844,13 +844,23 @@
                      };

                      epit1: epit at 20d0000 { /* EPIT1 */
epit1: timer at 20d0000 { ...

And /* EPIT1 */ comment can be removed, it is quite clear from the same
line context.

Formally it is a subject to another patch, but I think this can be
accepted as a part of this one.
Should I also update other boards ?
I only did it for imx6qdl.dtsi, but the EPIT is present in other boards
but i can't test it myself.
Sure, please do it, why not, it is quite a safe modification.

One change per one dtsi file will suffice, and I see that imx25.dtsi
already contains the requested change, however probably you may
want to update its compatible = "fsl,imx25-epit" line.

Regarding compatibles for other imx6* SoCs, I think all of them should
be documented in fsl,imxepit.txt and then added to the correspondent
dtsi files one per SoC.
Nvidia UART doc did this :
        - For other Tegra, must contain '"nvidia,<chip>-uart",
          "nvidia,tegra20-uart"' where <chip> is tegra30, tegra114, tegra124,

I will follow this.
And I forgot the outcome of one former discussion with Uwe Kleine-K?nig,
but if my bad memory serves me, we agreed that i.MX25 was released later
than i.MX31, so the most generic (the last value in the list) compatible
should be a compatible with i.MX31 like in

        imx25.dtsi:367: compatible = "fsl,imx25-gpt", "fsl,imx31-gpt";

--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
Regards,
Clement
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help