On 02/11/17 07:23, Stephen Boyd wrote:

On 09/28, Sudeep Holla wrote:

quoted

On some ARM based systems, a separate Cortex-M based System Control
Processor(SCP) provides the overall power, clock, reset and system
control. System Control and Management Interface(SCMI) Message Protocol
is defined for the communication between the Application Cores(AP)
and the SCP.

This patch adds support for the clocks provided by SCP using SCMI
protocol.

Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <redacted>
Cc: linux-clk at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted>
---

Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <redacted>

Thanks

quoted

 MAINTAINERS            |   2 +-
 drivers/clk/Kconfig    |  10 +++
 drivers/clk/Makefile   |   1 +
 drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c | 210 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 23ec3471f542..32c184391aee 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS

@@ -12941,7 +12941,7 @@ M:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
 L:	linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
 S:	Maintained
 F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,sc[mp]i.txt
-F:	drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c
+F:	drivers/clk/clk-sc[mp]i.c

Is there a lot of copy/paste going on from clk-scpi.c? Maybe it
could be consolidated?

Not much apart from the usual driver skeleton. Also SCPI specification
will not be enhanced any further while SCMI will be. So they will
deviated in the feature set going further. Even I was thinking of
merging then together initially but based on some WIP changes to the
specification, I thought it may not be good idea. But if we think it can
be merged in future , I will do that for sure(for easy maintenance)

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep