Thread (83 messages) 83 messages, 8 authors, 2017-11-03

[PATCH v3 11/22] firmware: arm_scmi: add support for polling based SCMI transfers

From: Sudeep Holla <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-04 11:19:07
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml


On 04/10/17 12:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Sudeep Holla [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
It would be useful to have options to perform some SCMI transfers
atomically by polling for the completion flag instead of interrupt
driven. The SCMI specification has option to disable the interrupt and
poll for the completion flag in the shared memory.

This patch adds support for polling based SCMI transfers using that
option. This might be used for uninterrupted/atomic DVFS operations
from the scheduler context.
multi-millisecond timeouts from inside the scheduler sound like a
really bad idea. Could this maybe get changed to an asynchronous
operation?
We already support asynchronous version. This is mainly to support fast
DVFS switching done at context switch. I can reduce the timeouts to
few uS as the whole idea of fast dvfs is we can't return or schedule out
of this function. Typically the remote should see the request in < 10 uS
and acknowledge it.
quoted
+       if (xfer->hdr.poll_completion) {
+               timeout = info->desc->max_rx_timeout_ms * 100;
+               while (!scmi_xfer_poll_done(info, xfer) && timeout--)
+                       udelay(10);
The timeout calculation is bad as well, since both the
scmi_xfer_poll_done() call and udelay() can take much longer
than the 10 microsecond delay that you use for the calculation.
Ah, agreed. I will change it to few uS as that's what is expected.
If you want to do a timeout check like this, it should generally
be done using ktime_get()/ktime_add()/ktime_before().
Good idea, will try to use that.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help