Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 3 authors, 2017-06-14

[PATCH v4 2/2] arm: dts: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c device node

From: matthias.bgg@gmail.com (Matthias Brugger)
Date: 2017-06-14 09:25:10
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-i2c, linux-mediatek, lkml


On 14/06/17 03:11, Jun Gao wrote:
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 15:45 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
quoted
On 13/06/17 15:23, Jun Gao wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 14:52 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
quoted
On 13/06/17 12:24, Jun Gao wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 11:36 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
quoted
On 12/06/17 13:54, Jun Gao wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 15:35 +0800, Jun Gao wrote:
quoted
From: Jun Gao <redacted>

Add MT2701 i2c device node.

Signed-off-by: Jun Gao <redacted>
---
     arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
     arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi    | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
     2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
[...]
quoted
Dear Matthias,

Could you take this patch together with
[PATCH v4 1/2]dt-bindings: i2c: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c binding ?

Thanks!
They are both included in the pull request I send [1] [2], or do I miss
something?

Regards,
Matthias

[1]
https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/729b7f8dbdaff270c53052897ea06486221a49a2
[2]
https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/c6c301d3ff7531894257acc4f4a73928a109bda1
Dear Matthias,

Would you mind to use the same style as follows in i2c-mtk.txt of [2]?

"mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT2701
"mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577
"mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589
"mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT7623
"mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173


Thanks!
You mean I should fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding
description? Or do you mean it should be MTxxxx instead of mtxxxx?

Regards,
Matthias
Dear Matthias,

I mean fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding description. Is it OK?
Then I can't see the difference between what you are asking for and what
is already pushed to the repository. Please send a patch, that will make
things clearer.

Regards,
Matthias
Dear Matthias,

like this:

diff:
  Required properties:
    - compatible: value should be either of the following.
-      (a) "mediatek,mt6577-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6577 i2c.
-      (b) "mediatek,mt6589-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6589 i2c.
-      (c) "mediatek,mt8127-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8127 i2c.
-      (d) "mediatek,mt8135-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8135 i2c.
-      (e) "mediatek,mt8173-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8173 i2c.
+       "mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek
MT2701
+       "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577
+       "mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589
+       "mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek
MT7623
+       "mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173
    - reg: physical base address of the controller and dma base, length
of memory
      mapped region.
    - interrupts: interrupt number to the cpu.
Please look at [2], this is already staged.

[2] 
https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/c6c301d3ff7531894257acc4f4a73928a109bda1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help